<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Digital Revolution in Advertising</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tulsamarketingonline.com/blog/the-digital-revolution-in-advertising/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tulsamarketingonline.com/blog/the-digital-revolution-in-advertising/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 14:42:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.tulsamarketingonline.com/blog/the-digital-revolution-in-advertising/comment-page-1/#comment-1200</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 03:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tulsamarketingonline.com/blog/?p=77#comment-1200</guid>
		<description>Very interesting suggestions.  I think Clemons has some valid ideas, but the fact that advertising has existed since &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advertising#History&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;ancient Egypt&lt;/a&gt; means that his argument is a bit hard to agree with.

I&#039;ll agree - consumers do not trust advertising or wish to view it - but what if it&#039;s presented in a way that they don&#039;t perceive it as blatant advertising, but as information about a need/want they have?  In that case, it&#039;s quite functional.  Good marketing can do that.  As for #3, sure - but businesses need advertising.  And it will always exist because of that, online or otherwise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting suggestions.  I think Clemons has some valid ideas, but the fact that advertising has existed since <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advertising#History" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">ancient Egypt</a> means that his argument is a bit hard to agree with.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll agree &#8211; consumers do not trust advertising or wish to view it &#8211; but what if it&#8217;s presented in a way that they don&#8217;t perceive it as blatant advertising, but as information about a need/want they have?  In that case, it&#8217;s quite functional.  Good marketing can do that.  As for #3, sure &#8211; but businesses need advertising.  And it will always exist because of that, online or otherwise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rafi Arbel</title>
		<link>http://www.tulsamarketingonline.com/blog/the-digital-revolution-in-advertising/comment-page-1/#comment-1198</link>
		<dc:creator>Rafi Arbel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 03:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tulsamarketingonline.com/blog/?p=77#comment-1198</guid>
		<description>You must go where the people are. But what if you show up to the party and no one pays attention? Eric Clemons argues that advertising will fail, on-line or otherwise, because: 1. Consumers do not trust advertisers; 2. Customers do not want to view advertising; and 3. Consumers do not need advertising. See http://ow.ly/jrYJ. Interesting premise; market changing if its true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You must go where the people are. But what if you show up to the party and no one pays attention? Eric Clemons argues that advertising will fail, on-line or otherwise, because: 1. Consumers do not trust advertisers; 2. Customers do not want to view advertising; and 3. Consumers do not need advertising. See <a href="http://ow.ly/jrYJ" rel="nofollow">http://ow.ly/jrYJ</a>. Interesting premise; market changing if its true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

